Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 

photoshopped to hell.

Tue Jun 28, 2005, 3:17 PM
i think some people just over-do their photos so much in photoshop that it shouldn't even be considered an actual "photograph" any longer, it should be categorized in digital art. eh. i know i'm not alone when i say this too.

i mean i see the full view of the photo and you can just see every bit of it is photoshopped or fucked with. i mean, fuck me, you want to call yourself a photographer? get rid of half of the photoshopping and you're a tad bit closer to that title, ey.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconbexe:
a-fucking-men.

photoshop is amazing in small doses..
but it's a fucking weapon in the hands of the overindulgent.

a little goes a long way.
a lot looks like yesterday's shit. ;)

--
"Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est." -Seneca, Letters to Lucilius
:iconbribes:
you, my dear, are the perfect example of photoshop in small, sane doses & i thank as well as admire you for that :)

if only i had more creativity and skill. i can only hope in time i'll get better

<3

--
love,
racquel
:iconbexe:
aww.
thank you much.

--
"Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est." -Seneca, Letters to Lucilius
:icondavelez:
here here :-)
I only do in photoshop what I am able to do in my darkroom :-)
:icondanyellah:
I agree completely.

--
"Right now, it seems like its okay to be a mediocre photographer, or mediocre artists, in general. It’s okay to be half ass about everything and I just think that’s wack."-LYNETTE ASTAIRE
:camera:
:iconlithiumene:
I fully agree with you. I see it mostly in glamour shots and the women are hideous because it's obviously touched up and their flesh looks unnatural.

They should be reported for miscategorization at least, and my opinion of this misleading perception of beauty is that it's just flawed.

--
悔 や み た く な い よ 生 ま れ た こ と 。

Journal History

Site Map